Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based synthetic CT images from T2-weighted MR images for cervical cancer patients compared to MRCAT.

This work aims to investigate the clinical feasibility of deep learning-based synthetic CT images for cervix cancer, comparing them to MR for calculating attenuation (MRCAT). Patient cohort with 50 pairs of T2-weighted MR and CT images from cervical cancer patients was split into 40 for training and 10 for testing phases. We conducted deformable image registration and Nyul intensity normalization for MR images to maximize the similarity between MR and CT images as a preprocessing step. The processed images were plugged into a deep learning model, generative adversarial network. To prove clinical feasibility, we assessed the accuracy of synthetic CT images in image similarity using structural similarity (SSIM) and mean-absolute-error (MAE) and dosimetry similarity using gamma passing rate (GPR). Dose calculation was performed on the true and synthetic CT images with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm. Synthetic CT images generated by deep learning outperformed MRCAT images in image similarity by 1.5% in SSIM, and 18.5 HU in MAE. In dosimetry, the DL-based synthetic CT images achieved 98.71% and 96.39% in the GPR at 1% and 1 mm criterion with 10% and 60% cut-off values of the prescription dose, which were 0.9% and 5.1% greater GPRs over MRCAT images.

Evaluation of the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble and its influence on dose.

We aimed to investigate the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble owing to the intrinsic inter-segment break of the Elekta linear accelerator (LINAC) and its adverse influence on the dose to the patient. The deliverability of DCAT was evaluated according to the plan parameters, which affect the gantry rotation speed and resultant positional inaccuracies; the deliverability according to the number of control points and dose rates was investigated by using treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices, respectively. A non-negligible degradation in DCAT deliverability due to gantry wobble was observed in both the treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices. The resulting dose-delivery error occurred below a certain number of control points or above a certain dose rate. Dose simulations in the patient domain showed a similar impact on deteriorated deliverability. For targets located primarily in the isocenter, the dose differences were negligible, whereas for organs at risk located mainly off-isocenter, the dose differences were significant up to - 8.77%. To ensure safe and accurate radiotherapy, optimal plan parameters should be selected, and gantry angle-specific validations should be conducted before treatment.

Cosmetic Outcome and Toxicity After Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to prospectively evaluate the toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of 5-fraction, stereotactic, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled women who underwent APBI for invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the breast. APBI was delivered using a CyberKnife M6 robotic radiosurgery system at 30 Gy in 5 nonconsecutive, once-daily fractions. Women undergoing whole breast irradiation (WBI) were also enrolled for comparison. Patient-reported and physician-assessed adverse events were recorded. Breast fibrosis was measured using a tissue compliance meter, and breast cosmesis was assessed using BCCT.core (an automatic, computer-based software). Outcomes were collected until 24 months posttreatment according to the study protocol. RESULTS: In total, 204 patients (APBI, n = 103; WBI, n = 101) were enrolled. Regarding patient-reported outcomes, the APBI group reported significantly less skin dryness (6.9% vs 18.3%; P = .015), radiation skin reaction (9.9% vs 23.5%; P = .010), and breast hardness (8.0% vs 20.4%; P = .011) at 6 months than the WBI group. On physician assessment, the APBI group had significantly less dermatitis at 12 months (1.0% vs 7.2%; P = .027) than the WBI group. Any severe toxicities after APBI were rare in patient-reported outcomes (score ≥3, 3.0%) and physician assessments (grade ≥3, 2.0%). In the uninvolved quadrants, measured fibrosis in the APBI group was significantly lower than that in the WBI group at 6 (P = .001) and 12 (P = .029) months but not at 24 months. In the involved quadrant, measured fibrosis in the APBI group was not significantly different from that in the WBI group at any time. Cosmetic outcomes in the APBI group were mostly excellent or good (77.6%) at 24 months, and there was no significant cosmetic detriment from the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic APBI was associated with less fibrosis in the uninvolved breast quadrants than WBI. Patients showed minimal toxicity and no detrimental effects on cosmesis after APBI.

Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

The objective of this study is to compare the plan robustness at various beam angles. Hence, the influence of the beam angles on robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) was evaluated in gantry-based carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer. 10 patients with prostate cancer were considered, and a total dose of 51.6 Gy (Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was prescribed for the target volume in 12 fractions. Five beam field plans comprising two opposed fields with different angle pairs were characterized. Further, dose parameters were extracted, and the RBE-weighted dose and LET values for all angle pairs were compared. All plans considering the setup uncertainty satisfied the dose regimen. When a parallel beam pair was used for perturbed scenarios to take into account set-up uncertainty in the anterior direction, the LET clinical treatment volume (CTV) D 95% standard deviation was 1.5 times higher, and the standard deviation of RBE-weighted CTV D 95% was 7.9 times higher compared to an oblique pair. The oblique beam fields were superior in terms of dose sparing for the rectum compared to the dose distribution using two conventional lateral opposed fields for prostate cancer.

Novel framework for determining TPS-calculated doses corresponding to detector locations using 3D camera inin vivosurface dosimetry.

Purpose. To address the shortcomings of current procedures for evaluating the measured-to-planned dose agreement inin vivodosimetry (IVD), this study aimed to develop an accurate and efficient novel framework to identify the detector location placed on a patient's skin surface using a 3D camera and determine the planned dose at the same anatomical position corresponding to the detector location.Methods. Breast cancer treatment was simulated using an anthropomorphic adult female phantom (ATOM 702D; CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA). An optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter was used for surface dose measurements (MyOSLchip, RadPro International GmbH, Germany) at six IVD points. Three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) of the phantom with the detector was performed in the treatment position using a 3D camera. The developed framework, iSMART, was designed to import 3DSI and treatment planning data for determining the position of the IVD detectors in the 3D treatment planning DICOM image. The clinical usefulness of iSMART was evaluated in terms of accuracy and efficiency, for comparison with the results obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance.Results. The relative dose difference between the planned doses determined using iSMART and CBCT images displayed similar accuracies (within approximately ±2.0%) at all detector locations. The relative dose differences between the planned and measured doses at the six detector locations ranged from -4.8% to 3.1% for the CBCT images and -3.5% to 2.1% for iSMART. The total time required to read the planned doses at six detector locations averaged at 8.1 and 0.8 min for the CBCT images and iSMART, respectively.Conclusions. The proposed framework can improve the robustness of IVD analyses and aid in accurate and efficient evaluations of the measured-to-planned dose agreement.

Metal artifact reduction in kV CT images throughout two-step sequential deep convolutional neural networks by combining multi-modal imaging (MARTIAN).

This work attempted to construct a new metal artifact reduction (MAR) framework in kilo-voltage (kV) computed tomography (CT) images by combining (1) deep learning and (2) multi-modal imaging, defined as MARTIAN (Metal Artifact Reduction throughout Two-step sequentIAl deep convolutional neural Networks). Most CNNs under supervised learning require artifact-free images to artifact-contaminated images for artifact correction. Mega-voltage (MV) CT is insensitive to metal artifacts, unlike kV CT due to different physical characteristics, which can facilitate the generation of artifact-free synthetic kV CT images throughout the first network (Network 1). The pairs of true kV CT and artifact-free kV CT images after post-processing constructed a subsequent network (Network 2) to conduct the actual MAR process. The proposed framework was implemented by GAN from 90 scans for head-and-neck and brain radiotherapy and validated with 10 independent cases against commercial MAR software. The artifact-free kV CT images following Network 1 and post-processing led to structural similarity (SSIM) of 0.997, and mean-absolute-error (MAE) of 10.2 HU, relative to true kV CT. Network 2 in charge of actual MAR successfully suppressed metal artifacts, relative to commercial MAR, while retaining the detailed imaging information, yielding the SSIM of 0.995 against 0.997 from the commercial MAR.

Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening- Filter-Free Photon Beams.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the dose calculation accuracy of Mobius3D for small-field flattening-filter-free x-rays, mainly utilized for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The accuracy of beam modeling and multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling in Mobius3D, significantly affecting the dose calculation is investigated. Methods: The commissioning procedures of Mobius3D were performed for unflattened 6 MV and 10 MV x-ray beams of the linear accelerator, including beam model adjustment and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization. An experimental study with artificial plans was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of small-field modeling. The dose calculation accuracy of Mobius3D was also evaluated for retrospective SBRT plans with multiple targets. Results: Both studies evaluated the dose calculation accuracy through comparisons with the measured data. Relatively large differences were observed for off-axis distances over 5 cm and for small fields less than 1 cm field size. For the study with artificial plans, the maximum absolute error of 9.96% for unflattened 6 MV and 9.07% for unflattened 10 MV was observed when the field size was 1 cm. For the study with patient plans, the mean gamma passing rate with 3%/3 mm gamma criterion was 63.6% for unflattened 6 MV and 82.6% for unflattened 10 MV. The maximum of the average dose difference was -19.9% for unflattened 6MV and -10.1% for unflattened 10MV. Conclusions: The dose calculation accuracy uncertainties of Mobius3D for small-field flattening-filter-free photon beams were observed. The study results indicated that the beam and MLC modeling of Mobius3D must be improved for use in SBRT pretreatment QA in clinical practice.

Comprehensive clinical evaluation of TomoEQA for patient-specific pre-treatment quality assurance in helical tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Based on a previous study on the feasibility of TomoEQA, an exit detector-based patient-specific pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) method for helical tomotherapy, an in-depth clinical evaluation was conducted. METHODS: Data of one hundred patients were analyzed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of TomoEQA for patient-specific pre-treatment QA in comparison with the conventional phantom-based method. Additional investigations were also performed under unusual measurement conditions to validate the off-axis region. In addition to the clinical evaluation of TomoEQA, a statistical analysis was conducted to determine the plan parameters that affect the pass/failure results of pre-treatment QA. RESULTS: The average and standard deviations of the gamma passing rate and point dose error for TomoEQA were comparable to those of the conventional QA method. For TomoEQA, the average values of the gamma passing rate and point dose error were 96.32% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 3.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 95.55 to 97.09) and - 1.12% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 1.04; CI, - 1.32 to - 0.92), respectively. For the conventional QA method, the average values of the gamma passing rate and point dose error were 95.95% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 4.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 95.10 to 96.80) and - 1.20% (standard deviation (1 sigma) = 1.61; CI, - 1.52 to - 0.88), respectively. Further experiments on the off-axis region demonstrated that TomoEQA can provide accurate results for 3D dose analysis, which is inherently difficult in the conventional QA method. Through a statistical analysis based on the results of TomoEQA, it was validated that the total fraction (Total Fx), monitor units, beam-on-time, leaf-of-time below 100 ms, and planning target volume diameter were statistically significant for the pass/failure of the pre-treatment QA results. CONCLUSIONS: TomoEQA is a clinically beneficial alternative to the conventional phantom-based QA method.

Performance Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms Using Computed Tomography of Multiple Lung Metastases.

Purpose: Various deformable image registration (DIR) methods have been used to evaluate organ deformations in 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) images scanned during the respiratory motions of a patient. This study assesses the performance of 10 DIR algorithms using 4D CT images of 5 patients with fiducial markers (FMs) implanted during the postoperative radiosurgery of multiple lung metastases. Methods: To evaluate DIR algorithms, 4D CT images of 5 patients were used, and ground-truths of FMs and tumors were generated by physicians based on their medical expertise. The positions of FMs and tumors in each 4D CT phase image were determined using 10 DIR algorithms, and the deformed results were compared with ground-truth data. Results: The target registration errors (TREs) between the FM positions estimated by optical flow algorithms and the ground-truth ranged from 1.82 ± 1.05 to 1.98 ± 1.17 mm, which is within the uncertainty of the ground-truth position. Two algorithm groups, namely, optical flow and demons, were used to estimate tumor positions with TREs ranging from 1.29 ± 1.21 to 1.78 ± 1.75 mm. With respect to the deformed position for tumors, for the 2 DIR algorithm groups, the maximum differences of the deformed positions for gross tumor volume tracking were approximately 4.55 to 7.55 times higher than the mean differences. Errors caused by the aforementioned difference in the Hounsfield unit values were also observed. Conclusions: We quantitatively evaluated 10 DIR algorithms using 4D CT images of 5 patients and compared the results with ground-truth data. The optical flow algorithms showed reasonable FM-tracking results in patient 4D CT images. The iterative optical flow method delivered the best performance in this study. With respect to the tumor volume, the optical flow and demons algorithms delivered the best performance.

Assessment of log-based fingerprinting system of Mobius3D with Elekta linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the matching error that occurs when the Mobius3D fingerprinting system is applied in conjunction with an Elekta linear accelerator (LINAC) and to offer an acceptable and alternative method for circumventing this problem. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To avoid the multileaf collimator (MLC) conflicting error in the Mobius3D fingerprinting system, we developed an in-house program to move the MLC in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) radiotherapy (RT)-Plan to pertinent positions, considering the relationship between log data and planned data. The re-delivered log files were calculated in the Mobius3D system, and the results were compared with those of corrected data (i.e., we analyzed a pair of re-collected log data and the previous DICOM RT-Plan data). The results were then evaluated by comparing several items, such as point dose errors, gamma index (GI) passing rates, and MLC root-mean-square (RMS) values. RESULTS: For the point dose error, the maximum difference found was below 2.0%. In the case of GI analysis of all plans, the maximum difference in the passing rates was below 1.4%. The statistical results obtained using a paired Student's t-test showed that there were no significant differences within the uncertainty. In the case of the RMS test, the maximum difference found was approximately 0.08 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that all the mismatched log files were sufficiently acceptable within the uncertainty. We conclude that the matching error obtained when applying Mobius3D to an Elekta LINAC may be addressed using a simple modification of the fingerprinting system, and we expect that our study findings will help vendors resolve this issue in the near future.

Development of a novel program for conversion from tetrahedral-mesh-based phantoms to DICOM dataset for radiation treatment planning: TET2DICOM.

PURPOSE: Tetrahedral mesh (TM)-based computational human phantoms have recently been developed for evaluation of exposure dose with the merit of precisely representing human anatomy and the changing posture freely. However, conversion of recently developed TM phantoms to the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file format, which can be utilized in the clinic, has not been attempted. The aim of this study was to develop a technique, called TET2DICOM, to convert the TM phantoms to DICOM datasets for accurate treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TM phantoms were sampled in voxel form to generate the DICOM computed tomography images. The DICOM-radiotherapy structure was defined based on the contour data. To evaluate TET2DICOM, the shape distortion of the TM phantoms during the conversion process was assessed, and the converted DICOM dataset was implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: The volume difference between the TM phantoms and the converted DICOM dataset was evaluated as less than about 0.1% in each organ. Subsequently, the converted DICOM dataset was successfully implemented in MIM (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, USA, version 6.5.6) and RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden, version 5.0). Additionally, the various possibilities of clinical application of the program were confirmed using a deformed TM phantom in various postures. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the TM phantom, currently the most advanced computational phantom, can be implemented in a commercial TPS and this technique can enable various TM-based applications, such as evaluation of secondary cancer risk in radiotherapy.

Development of a Margin Determination Framework for Tumor-Tracking Radiation Therapy With Intraoperatively Implanted Fiducial Markers.

PURPOSE: To develop an internal target volume (ITV) margin determination framework (or decision-supporting framework) for treating multiple lung metastases using CyberKnife Synchrony with intraoperatively implanted fiducial markers (IIFMs). The feasibility of using non-ideally implanted fiducial markers (a limited number and/or far from a target) for tracking-based lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was investigated. METHODS: In the developed margin determination framework, an optimal set of IIFMs was determined to minimize a tracking uncertainty-specific ITV (ITVtracking) margin (margin required to cover target-to-marker motion discrepancy), i.e., minimize the motion discrepancies between gross tumor volume (GTV) and the selected set of fiducial markers (FMs). The developed margin determination framework was evaluated in 17 patients with lung metastases. To automatically calculate the respiratory motions of the FMs, a template matching-based FM tracking algorithm was developed, and GTV motion was manually measured. Furthermore, during-treatment motions of the selected FMs were analyzed using log files and compared with those calculated using 4D CTs. RESULTS: For 41 of 42 lesions in 17 patients (97.6%), an optimal set of the IIFMs was successfully determined, requiring an ITVtracking margin less than 5 mm. The template matching-based FM tracking algorithm calculated the FM motions with a sub-millimeter accuracy compared with the manual measurements. The patient respiratory motions during treatment were, on average, significantly smaller than those measured at simulation for the patient cohort considered. CONCLUSION: Use of the developed margin determination framework employing CyberKnife Synchrony with a limited number of IIFMs is feasible for lung SABR.

Physical and Biological Characteristics of Particle Therapy for Oncologists.

Particle therapy is a promising and evolving modality of radiotherapy that can be used to treat tumors that are radioresistant to conventional photon beam radiotherapy. It has unique biological and physical advantages compared with conventional radiotherapy. The characteristic feature of particle therapy is the "Bragg peak," a steep and localized peak of dose, that enables precise delivery of the radiation dose to the tumor while effectively sparing normal organs. Especially, the charged particles (e.g., proton, helium, carbon) cause a high rate of energy loss along the track, thereby leading to high biological effectiveness, which makes particle therapy attractive. Using this property, the particle beam induces more severe DNA double-strand breaks than the photon beam, which is less influenced by the oxygen level. This review describes the general biological and physical aspects of particle therapy for oncologists, including non-radiation oncologists and beginners in the field.

Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study.

PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5-6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index.

Monitoring beam-quality constancy considering uncertainties associated with ionization chambers in Daily QA3 device.

This study evaluates the changes occurring in the X-ray energy of a linear accelerator (LINAC) using a Daily QA3 detector system. This is accomplished by comparing the Daily QA3 results against those obtained using a water phantom. The X-energy levels of a LINAC were monitored over a duration of 1 month using the Daily QA3 system. Moreover, to account for the uncertainty, the reproducibility of the Daily QA3 ionization-chamber results was assessed by performing repeated measurements (12 per day). Subsequently, the energy-monitoring results were compared with the energy-change results calculated using the water-phantom percentage depth dose (PDD) ratio. As observed, the 6- and 10-MV beams experienced average daily energy-level changes of (-0.30 ± 0.32)% and (0.05 ± 0.38)%, respectively, during repeated measurements. The corresponding energy changes equaled (-0.30 ± 0.55)% and (-0.05 ± 0.48)%, respectively, when considering the measurement uncertainty. The Daily QA3 measurements performed at 6 MV demonstrated a variation of (2.15 ± 0.81)% (i.e., up to 3%). Meanwhile, the corresponding measurements performed using a water phantom demonstrated an increase in the PDD ratio from 0.577 to 0.580 (i.e., approximately 0.5%). At 10 MV, the energy variation in the Daily QA3 measurements equaled (-0.41 ± 0.82)% (i.e., within 1.5%), whereas the corresponding water phantom PDD ratio remained constant at 0.626. These results reveal that the Daily QA3 system can be used to monitor small energy changes occurring within radiotherapy machines. This demonstrates its potential for use as a secondary system for monitoring energy changes as part of the daily quality-assurance workflow.

TomoEQA: Dose verification for patient-specific quality assurance in helical tomotherapy using an exit detector.

PURPOSE: Existing phantom-less quality assurance (QA) platforms does not provide patient-specific QA for helical tomotherapy (HT). A new system, called TomoEQA, is presented to facilitate this using the leaf open time (LOT) of a binary multi-leaf collimator, as measured by an exit detector. METHODS: TomoEQA was designed to provide measurement-based LOTs based on detector data and to generate a new digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) dataset that includes the measured LOTs for use by secondary check platforms. To evaluate the system, 20 patient-specific QAs were performed using the program in Mobius3D software, and the results were compared to conventional phantom-based QA results. RESULTS: From our assessment, most of the differences between the planned and measured (or calculated) data, excluding one case, were within the acceptance criteria comparing with those of conventional QA. Regarding the gamma analysis, all results considered in this study were within the acceptance criteria. In addition, the developed system was performed for a failed case and showed approximately the same trends as the conventional approach. CONCLUSIONS: TomoEQA could perform patient-specific QAs of HT using Mobius3D and provide reliable patient-specific QAs results by evaluating point dose errors and 3D gamma passing rates. TomoEQA could also distinguish whether an intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan failed or not.

Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the parameters with a significant impact on delivery quality assurance (DQA) failure and analyze the planning parameters as possible predictors of DQA failure for helical tomotherapy. METHODS: In total, 212 patients who passed or failed DQA measurements were retrospectively included in this study. Brain (n = 43), head and neck (n = 37), spinal (n = 12), prostate (n = 36), rectal (n = 36), pelvis (n = 13), cranial spinal irradiation and a treatment field including lymph nodes (n = 24), and other types of cancer (n = 11) were selected. The correlation between DQA results and treatment planning parameters were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curves (AUCs), and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm were used to analyze treatment planning parameters as possible predictors for DQA failure. RESULTS: The AUC for leaf open time (LOT) was 0.70, and its cut-off point was approximately 30%. The ROC curve for the predicted probability calculated when the multivariate variable model was applied showed an AUC of 0.815. We confirmed that total monitor units, total dose, and LOT were significant predictors for DQA failure using the CART. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of DQA failure was higher when the percentage of LOT below 100 ms was higher than 30%. The percentage of LOT below 100 ms should be considered in the treatment planning process. The findings from this study may assist in the prediction of DQA failure in the future.

Sensitivity of radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters to accumulated doses.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of accumulated doses on radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLGDs) from measurements involving mega-voltage photons. METHODS: Forty-five commercially available RPLGDs were irradiated to estimate their dose responses. Photon beams of 6, 10, and 15 MV were irradiated onto the RPLGDs inside a phantom, which were divided into five groups with different doses and energies. Groups 1 and 2 were irradiated at 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 Gy in a sequential manner; Group 3 was irradiated 10 times with a dose of 10 Gy; and Groups 4 and 5 followed the same method as that of Group 3, but with doses of 50 Gy and 100 Gy, respectively. Each device was subjected to a measurement reading procedure each time irradiation. RESULTS: For the annealed Group 1, RPLGD exhibited a linearity response with variance within 5%. For the non-annealed Group 2, readings demonstrated hyperlinearity at 6 MV and 10 MV, and linearity at 15 MV. Following the 100 Gy irradiation, the readings for Group 2 were 118.7 ± 1.9%, 112.2 ± 2.7%, and 101.5 ± 2.3% at 6, 10, and 15 MV, respectively. For Groups 3, 4, and 5, the responsiveness of the RPLGDs gradually decreased as the number of repeated irradiations increased. The percentage readings for the 10th beam irradiation with respect to the readings for the primary beam irradiation were 84.6 ± 1.9%, 87.5 ± 2.4%, and 93.0 ± 3.0% at 6 MV, 10 MV, and 15 MV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The non-annealed RPLGD response to dose was hyperlinear for the 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams but not for the 15 MV photon beam. Additionally, the annealed RPLGD exhibited a fading phenomenon when the measurement was repeated several times and demonstrated a relatively large fading effect at low energies than at high energies.

A Retrospective Dosimetric Analysis of the New ESTRO-ACROP Target Volume Delineation Guidelines for Postmastectomy Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy After Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Purpose: The European Society of Radiation & Oncology and Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) presented new guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) delineation in post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR-i). This study evaluated the dosimetric characteristics, dosimetric accuracy, and delivery accuracy of these guidelines in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: This retrospective study included 15 patients with left breast cancer who underwent mastectomy with tissue expander placement followed by PMRT. An experienced radiation oncologist delineated the CTV twice on the same image datasets based on the ESTRO-ACROP (EA-TVD) and conventional target volume delineation (C-TVD) guidelines. All VMAT plans, which used a double partial arc, were generated using six MV photons. Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters for organs at risk were compared. Dosimetric accuracy of the treatment plans and delivery accuracy were assessed. Results: Target volume of EA-TVD was significantly smaller than that of C-TVD. Although no statistically significant difference was noted in the target coverage between the two VMAT plans, EA-TVD VMAT significantly reduced the mean heart dose (3.99 ± 1.02 vs. 5.84 ± 1.78 Gy, p = 0.000), the maximum left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose (9.43 ± 3.04 vs. 13.97 ± 6.04 Gy, p = 0.026), and the mean LAD dose (4.52 ± 1.31 vs. 6.35 ± 2.79 Gy, p = 0.028) compared with C-TVD VMAT. No significant difference was observed with respect to the total monitor units, plan complexity, and delivery quality assurance. Conclusions: This is the first study to show significant dose reduction for the normal heart and LAD tissue offered by the EA-TVD, while maintaining dosimetric and delivery accuracy, in PMRT after IBR-i in VMAT for left-sided breast cancer patients.

Commissioning and clinical implementation of Mobius3D and MobiusFX: Experience on multiple linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: To provide practical guidelines for Mobius3D commissioning based on experiences of commissioning/clinical implementation of Mobius3D and MobiusFX as patient-specific quality assurance tools on multiple linear accelerators. METHODS: The vendor-suggested Mobius3D commissioning procedures, including beam model adjustment and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) optimization, were performed for 6 MV X-ray beams of six Elekta linear accelerators. For the beam model adjustment, beam data, such as the percentage depth dose, off-axis ratio (OAR), and output factor (OF), were measured using a water phantom and compared to the vendor-provided reference values. DLG optimization was performed to determine an optimal DLG correction factor to minimize the mean difference between Mobius3D-calculated and measured doses for multiple volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Small-field VMAT plans, in which Mobius3D has dose calculate uncertainties, were initially included in the DLG optimization, but excluded later. RESULTS: The measured beam data were consistent across the six linear accelerators. Relatively large differences between the reference and measured values were observed for the OAR at large off-axis distances (>5 cm) and for the OF for small fields (<3 × 3 cm2). The optimal DLG correction factor was 0.6 ±â€¯0.3 (range: 0.3-1.0) with small-field plans and 0.2 ±â€¯0.2 (0.0-0.5) without them. CONCLUSIONS: A reasonable agreement was found between the vendor-provided reference and measured beam models. DLG optimization results were dependent on the selection of the VMAT plans, requiring careful attention to the known dose calculation uncertainties of Mobius3D when determining a DLG correction factor.